Perceptions of Learners and Specialists Toward ECHO Palliative Care Project in Thailand.

INTRODUCTION: The Extension of Community Health Outcomes (ECHO) is a global movement that aims to decentralize the knowledge of specialists to primary care. A pilot, ECHO palliative care project in Thailand, was introduced to enhance the implementation of palliative care practice. OBJECTIVE: To assess learners' and palliative care specialists' perceptions toward the ECHO palliative care project to improve and expand the project in the future. SETTING: A total of 15 hospitals in 7 provinces in Northern Thailand, including provincial and district hospitals. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted among learners (primary care providers) and palliative care specialists who participated in the pilot program. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the potential impact of the project on clinical practice, the strengths and weaknesses of the ECHO program and platform in the Thai context, and suggestions for expansion. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative analysis. Pre- and post-confidence scores, using a 5-point Likert Scale, for palliative care practice among learners were analyzed using paired T-tests. RESULTS: Twenty participants were interviewed: 15 learners and 5 palliative care specialists. The confidence in practicing palliative care after participating in the ECHO palliative care project significantly increased for the learners, from 2.93 (95% CI, 2.49-3.38) to 3.93 (95% CI, 3.68-4.19) points (P = .003). Three themes emerged through the process evaluation of the pilot ECHO palliative care project: (1) applicable lessons that can translate to practice, (2) an effective learning program and assessable platform, and (3) suggestions for expansion. CONCLUSION: The ECHO palliative care project increased confidence in providing palliative care for primary care providers in Thailand. Through capacity building, participants reported applying the knowledge to improve local health services and develop a network for consultations and referrals. There is potential for expansion of the ECHO palliative care project in Thailand.

Is aggressive care appropriate for patients with cancer complicated by pneumonia? A retrospective chart review in a tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia in cancer patients is often problematic in order to decide whether to admit and administer antibiotics or pursue a comfort care pathway that may avoid in-hospital death. We aimed to identify factors which are easily assessed at admission in Thailand's healthcare context that could serve as prognostic factors for in-hospital death. METHODS: Regression analysis was utilized to identify the prognostic factors from clinical factors collected at admission. The primary outcome was in-hospital death. Data was collected from the electronic medical records of Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand, from 2016 to 2017. Data on adult cancer patients admitted due to pneumonia were reviewed. RESULTS: In total, 245 patients were included, and 146 (59.6%) were male. The median age of the patients was 66 years (IQR: 57-75). A total of 72 (29.4%) patients died during admission. From multivariate logistic regression, prognostic factors for in-hospital death included: Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) ≤ 30 (OR: 8.47, 95% CI: 3.47-20.66), Palliative Performance Scale 40-50% (OR: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.34-5.81), percentage of lymphocytes ≤ 8.0% (OR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.08-4.08), and pulse oximetry ≤ 90% (OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.04-3.87). CONCLUSION: The in-hospital death rate of cancer patients admitted with pneumonia was approximately 30%. The PPS of 10-30%, PPS of 40-50%, percentage of lymphocytes ≤ 8%, and oxygen saturation < 90% could serve as prognostic factors for in-hospital death. Further prospective studies are needed to investigate the usefulness of these factors.